Multicenter comparison of Chiari malformation type I presentation in children versus adults.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment for Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) often includes surgical intervention in both pediatric and adult patients. The authors sought to investigate fundamental differences between these populations by analyzing data from pediatric and adult patients who required CM-I decompression. METHODS: To better understand the presentation and surgical outcomes of both groups of patients, retrospective data from 170 adults and 153 pediatric patients (2000-2019) at six institutions were analyzed. RESULTS: The adult CM-I patient population requiring surgical intervention had a greater proportion of female patients than the pediatric population (p < 0.0001). Radiographic findings at initial clinical presentation showed a significantly greater incidence of syringomyelia (p < 0.0001) and scoliosis (p < 0.0001) in pediatric patients compared with adult patients with CM-I. However, presenting signs and symptoms such as headaches (p < 0.0001), ocular findings (p = 0.0147), and bulbar symptoms (p = 0.0057) were more common in the adult group. After suboccipital decompression procedures, 94.4% of pediatric patients reported symptomatic relief compared with 75% of adults with CM-I (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Here, the authors present the first retrospective evaluation comparing adult and pediatric patients who underwent CM-I decompression. Their analysis reveals that pediatric and adult patients significantly differ in terms of demographics, radiographic findings, presentation of symptoms, surgical indications, and outcomes. These findings may indicate different clinical conditions or a distinct progression of the natural history of this complex disease process within each population, which will require prospective studies to better elucidate.

Biomechanical Analysis of 2 Versus 4 Rods Across the Cervicothoracic Junction in a Human Cadaveric Model.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Posterior reconstruction of the cervicothoracic junction poses significant biomechanical challenges secondary to transition from the mobile cervical to rigid thoracic spines and change in alignment from lordosis to kyphosis. After destabilization, the objectives of the current investigation were to compare the rod strain and multidirectional flexibility properties of the cervicothoracic junction using a 4-rod vs traditional 2-rod reconstructions. METHODS: Ten human cadaveric cervicothoracic specimens underwent multidirectional flexibility testing including flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. After intact analysis, specimens were destabilized from C4 to T3 and instrumented from C3 to T4. The following reconstructions were tested: (1) 3.5-mm titanium (Ti) 2-rod, (2) 3.5-mm Ti 4-rod, (3) 4.0-mm cobalt chrome (CoCr) 2-rod, (4) 4.0-mm CoCr 4-rod, and (5) Ti 3.5- to 5.5-mm tapered rod reconstructions. The operative level range of motion and rod strain of the primary and accessory rods were quantified. RESULTS: The addition of accessory rods to a traditional 2-rod construct improved the biomechanical stability of the reconstructions in all three loading modalities for Ti ( P < .05). The accessory CoCr rods improved stability in flexion-extension and axial rotation ( P < .05). The addition of accessory rods in Ti or CoCr reconstructions did not significantly reduce rod strain ( P < .05). CoCr 2 and 4 rods exhibited less strain than both Ti 2 and 4 rods. CONCLUSION: Supplemental accessory rods affixed to traditional 2-rod constructs significantly improved stability of Ti alloys and CoCr alloy materials. The 4.0-mm CoCr rods provided greater stability than 3.5-mm Ti rods in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. While rod strain was not significantly reduced by the addition of accessory rods, it was reduced in CoCr rod treatment groups compared with the Ti rods.

Neurosurgical management of patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: A descriptive case series.

Introduction: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a connective tissue disorder that has been linked to several neurological problems including Chiari malformations, atlantoaxial instability (AAI), craniocervical instability (CCI), and tethered cord syndrome. However, neurosurgical management strategies for this unique population have not been well-explored to date. The purpose of this study is to explore cases of EDS patients who required neurosurgical intervention to better characterize the neurological conditions they face and to better understand how neurosurgeons should approach the management of these patients. Methods: A retrospective review was done on all patients with a diagnosis of EDS who underwent a neurosurgical operation with the senior author (FAS) between January 2014 and December 2020. Demographic, clinical, operative, and outcome data were collected, with additional radiographic data collected on patients chosen as case illustrations. Results: Sixty-seven patients were identified who met the criteria for this study. The patients experienced a wide array of preoperative diagnoses, with Chiari malformation, AAI, CCI, and tethered cord syndrome representing the majority. The patients underwent a heterogeneous group of operations with the majority including a combination of the following procedures- suboccipital craniectomy, occipitocervical fusion, cervical fusion, odontoidectomy, and tethered cord release. The vast majority of patients experienced subjective symptomatic relief from their series of procedures. Conclusions: EDS patients are prone to instability, especially in the occipital-cervical region, which may predispose these patients to require a higher rate of revision procedures and may require modifications in neurosurgical management that should be further explored.

Basis for error in stereotactic and computer-assisted surgery in neurosurgical applications: literature review.

Technological advancements in optoelectronic motion capture systems have allowed for the development of high-precision computer-assisted surgery (CAS) used in cranial and spinal surgical procedures. Errors generated sequentially throughout the chain of components of CAS may have cumulative effect on the accuracy of implant and instrumentation placement - potentially affecting patient outcomes. Navigational integrity and maintenance of fidelity of optoelectronic data is the cornerstone of CAS. Error reporting measures vary between studies. Understanding error generation, mechanisms of propagation, and how they relate to workflow can assist clinicians in error mitigation and improve accuracy during navigation in neurosurgical procedures. Diligence in planning, fiducial positioning, system registration, and intra-operative workflow have the potential to improve accuracy and decrease disparity between planned and final instrumentation and implant position. This study reviews the potential errors associated with each step in computer-assisted surgery and provides a basis for disparity in intrinsic accuracy versus achieved accuracy in the clinical operative environment.

Minimally Invasive Surgical Decompression without Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Synovial Cysts: Feasibility and Long-Term Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar synovial cysts (LSCs) can cause painful radiculopathy and sensory and/or motor deficits. Historically, first-line surgical treatment has been decompression with fusion. Recently, minimally invasive laminectomy without fusion has shown equal or superior results to traditional decompression and fusion methods. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the long-term efficacy of minimally invasive laminectomy without fusion in the treatment of LSC as it relates to the rate of subsequent fusion surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed over a 10-year period of patients undergoing minimally invasive laminectomy for symptomatic LSCs. The primary end point was the rate of revision surgery requiring fusion. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients with symptomatic LSCs underwent minimally invasive laminectomy alone January 2010-August 2020 at our institution. The most common location was L4-5 (72%). Preoperative imaging identified spondylolisthesis (grade 1) in 43 patients (57%), none of which was unstable on available dynamic radiographs. Average procedure duration was 93 minutes, with 78% of patients discharged home on the same day of surgery. Over 46 months of mean follow-up, 17 patients (20%) required 19 revision operations. Of those operations, 16 were spinal fusions (17.6%). Median time to fusion surgery was 36 months. There were no identifiable risk factors on multivariate regression analysis that predicted the need for fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive laminectomy is an effective first-line treatment for symptomatic LSCs and avoids the need for fusion in most treated patients. Of our patients, 18% required a fusion over 46 months, suggesting that further studies are required to guide patient selection.

Lateral versus prone robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement: a CT-based comparative assessment of accuracy.

OBJECTIVE: Single-position lateral lumbar interbody fusion (SP-LLIF) has recently gained significant popularity due to increased operative efficiency, but it remains technically challenging. Robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw (RA-PPS) placement can facilitate screw placement in the lateral position. The authors have reported their initial experience with SP-LLIF with RA-PPS placement in the lateral position, and they have compared this accuracy with that of RA-PPS placement in the prone position. METHODS: The authors reviewed prospectively collected data from their first 100 lateral-position RA-PPSs. The authors graded screw accuracy on CT and compared it to the accuracy of all prone-position RA-PPS procedures during the same time period. The authors analyzed the effect of several demographic and perioperative metrics, as a whole and specifically for lateral-position RA-PPS placement. RESULTS: The authors placed 99 lateral-position RA-PPSs by using the ExcelsiusGPS robotic platform in the first 18 consecutive patients who underwent SP-LLIF with postoperative CT imaging; these patients were compared with 346 prone-position RA-PPSs that were placed in the first consecutive 64 patients during the same time period. All screws were placed at L1 to S1. Overall, the lateral group had 14 breaches (14.1%) and the prone group had 25 breaches (7.2%) (p = 0.032). The lateral group had 5 breaches (5.1%) greater than 2 mm (grade C or worse), and the prone group had 4 (1.2%) (p = 0.015). The operative level had an effect on the breach rate, with breach rates (grade C or worse) of 7.1% at L3 and 2.8% at L4. Most breaches were grade B (< 2 mm) and lateral, and no breach had clinical sequelae or required revision. Within the lateral group, multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that BMI and number of levels affected accuracy, but the side that was positioned up or down did not. CONCLUSIONS: RA-PPSs can improve the feasibility of SP-LLIF. Spine surgeons should be cautious and selective with this technique owing to decreased accuracy in the lateral position, particularly in obese patients. Further studies should compare SP-LLIF techniques performed while the patient is in the prone and lateral positions.

Robot-assisted and augmented reality-assisted spinal instrumentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of screw accuracy and outcomes over the last decade.

OBJECTIVE: The use of technology-enhanced methods in spine surgery has increased immensely over the past decade. Here, the authors present the largest systematic review and meta-analysis to date that specifically addresses patient-centered outcomes, including the risk of inaccurate screw placement and perioperative outcomes in spinal surgeries using robotic instrumentation and/or augmented reality surgical navigation (ARSN). METHODS: A systematic review of the literature in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases spanning the last decade (January 2011-November 2021) was performed to present all clinical studies comparing robot-assisted instrumentation and ARSN with conventional instrumentation techniques in lumbar spine surgery. The authors compared these two technologies as they relate to screw accuracy, estimated blood loss (EBL), intraoperative time, length of stay (LOS), perioperative complications, radiation dose and time, and the rate of reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 64 studies were analyzed that included 11,113 patients receiving 20,547 screws. Robot-assisted instrumentation was associated with less risk of inaccurate screw placement (p < 0.0001) regardless of control arm approach (freehand, fluoroscopy guided, or navigation guided), fewer reoperations (p < 0.0001), fewer perioperative complications (p < 0.0001), lower EBL (p = 0.0005), decreased LOS (p < 0.0001), and increased intraoperative time (p = 0.0003). ARSN was associated with decreased radiation exposure compared with robotic instrumentation (p = 0.0091) and fluoroscopy-guided (p < 0.0001) techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, the pooled data suggest that technology-enhanced thoracolumbar instrumentation is advantageous for both patients and surgeons. As the technology progresses and indications expand, it remains essential to continue investigations of both robotic instrumentation and ARSN to validate meaningful benefit over conventional instrumentation techniques in spine surgery.

Craniocervical Stabilization After Failed Chiari Decompression: A Case Series of a Population with High Prevalence of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of Chiari malformation type I (CM-I), posterior fossa decompression is achieved via suboccipital craniectomy (SOC); however, some patients continue to experience symptoms after treatment, which may be due to craniocervical instability (CCI). The purposes of this study were to analyze data from patients who required an occipitocervical fusion (OCF) for the management of CCI after having previously undergone SOC for CM-I to determine if OCF is a safe and effective option and to determine any identifiable risk factors for CCI in these patients. METHODS: A retrospective review was done on all patients who underwent an OCF performed by the senior author between November 2013 and June 2020 after having previously undergone SOC for CM-I. Demographic, radiographic, perioperative, and outcome data were collected and clivoaxial angles (CXAs) were measured pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were identified who developed symptomatic CCI after previously undergoing a suboccipital craniectomy for the treatment of CM-I. All 15 patients were treated by OCF with good outcome. Of these, 12 patients had a known diagnosis of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS). Overall, the CXAs of these patients were found to be corrected to a more anatomical alignment. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic CCI should be recognized as a delayed postoperative complication in the surgical treatment of CM-I, with an underlying connective tissue hypermobility disorder such as EDS serving as a potential risk factor its development. CCI can be managed with OCF as a safe and effective treatment option for this patient population.

Incidental Durotomy Following Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Disease and the Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique on the Rate and Need for Surgical Revision: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Incidental durotomy (ID) is a common complication during lumbar spine surgery. A paucity of literature has studied the impact of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) on durotomy rates and strategies for repair as compared to open surgery. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact that MIS techniques have on the durotomy rate, repair techniques, and need for surgical revision following surgery for degenerative lumbar disease as compared to open technique. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of consecutive cases between 2013 and 2016 was performed. All patients underwent lumbar decompression with or without instrumented fusion for degenerative pathology using either open posterior or MIS techniques. ID rate, closure technique, and need for surgical revision related to the durotomy were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 1,196 patients were included with an overall ID rate of 6.8%. There was no difference between open or minimally invasive surgical techniques (P = .14). There was a higher durotomy rate with open technique in patients that underwent decompression with fusion (P = .03) as well as in revision cases (P = .02). Primary repair was feasible more frequently in the open group (P = .001), whereas use of dural substitute (P < .001) was more common in the MIS group. Fibrin sealant was used routinely in both groups (P = .34). There were no failed repairs, regardless of technique used. CONCLUSION: MIS techniques may reduce durotomies in cases involving instrumentation or revisions. Use of dural substitute onlay and fibrin sealant was effective at preventing reoperation. Both MIS and open techniques result in a low rate of future surgical revision when a durotomy occurs.

Does minimally invasive spine surgery improve outcomes in the obese population? A retrospective review of 1442 degenerative lumbar spine surgeries.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of obesity on outcomes in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches to posterior lumbar surgery is not well characterized. The authors aimed to determine if there was a difference in operative variables and complication rates in obese patients who underwent MIS versus open approaches in posterior spinal surgery, as well as between obese and nonobese patients undergoing MIS approaches. METHODS: A retrospective review of all consecutive patients who underwent posterior lumbar surgery from 2013 to 2016 at a single institution was performed. The primary outcome measure was postoperative complications. Secondary outcome measures included estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, the need for revision, and hospital length of stay (LOS); readmission and disposition were also reviewed. Obese patients who underwent MIS were compared with those who underwent an open approach. Additionally, obese patients who underwent an MIS approach were compared with nonobese patients. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were carried out between the groups. RESULTS: In total, 423 obese patients (57.0% decompression and 43.0% fusion) underwent posterior lumbar MIS. When compared with 229 obese patients (56.8% decompression and 43.2% fusion) who underwent an open approach, patients in both the obese and nonobese groups who underwent MIS experienced significantly decreased EBL, LOS, operative time, and surgical site infections (SSIs). Of the nonobese patients, 538 (58.4% decompression and 41.6% fusion) underwent MIS procedures. When compared with nonobese patients, obese patients who underwent MIS procedures had significantly increased LOS, EBL, operative time, revision rates, complications, and readmissions in the decompression group. In the fusion group, only LOS and disposition were significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Obese patients have poorer outcomes after posterior lumbar MIS when compared with nonobese patients. The use of an MIS technique can be of benefit, as it decreased EBL, operative time, LOS, and SSIs for posterior decompression with or without instrumented fusion in obese patients.

Minimally invasive posterior lumbar surgery in the morbidly obese, obese and non-obese populations: A single institution retrospective review.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of information regarding outcomes in minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approaches to posterior lumbar surgery in morbidly obese patients. We seek to determine if there are differences in operative variables and early complication rates in morbidly obese patients undergoing MIS posterior lumbar surgery compared to obese and non-obese patients. METHODS: A single institution retrospective review of patients undergoing MIS posterior lumbar surgery (decompression and/or fusion) between 2013 and 2016 was performed. Morbidly obese patients (BMI ≥ 40) were compared to obese (BMI 30-39.9) and non-obese (BMI < 30) cohorts. Postoperative complication rates and perioperative variables including estimated blood loss, operative time, and outcome measures including length of stay (LOS), in-hospital complications, readmission, and disposition were assessed. RESULTS: 47 morbidly obese, 135 obese and 224 non-obese patients underwent posterior MIS instrumented fusion. 59 morbidly obese, 182 obese and 314 non-obese patients underwent posterior MIS decompression. The morbidly obese group experienced a greater rate of deep vein thrombosis and had an increased hospital LOS (p < 0.05). Morbidly obese patients who underwent MIS decompression experienced increased postoperative complications (p < 0.01), and increased LOS (p < 0.0001) compared to obese and non-obese patients. There were no differences in revision rates, readmissions, and other complications including surgical site infection. Morbid obesity was an independent predictor of overall complications and increased LOS on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Morbidly obese patients undergoing posterior MIS fusion had a higher rate of complications and increased LOS. While weight loss should be encouraged, complication rates remains acceptably low in morbidly obese patients and MIS posterior lumbar surgery should still be offered.

Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Standalone Versus Cage and Plate Constructs for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has conventionally been performed using an allograft cage with a plate-and-screw construct. Recently, standalone cages have gained popularity due to theorized decreases in operative time and postoperative dysphagia. Few studies have compared these outcomes. Here, we directly compare the outcomes of plated versus standalone ACDF constructs. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of patients undergoing ACDF after June 2011 with at least 6 months of follow up was conducted. Clinical outcomes were analyzed and compared between standalone and plated constructs. Multivariate regression analysis of the primary outcome, need for revision surgery, as well as several secondary outcomes, procedure duration, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay, disposition, and incidence of dysphagia, hoarseness, or surgical site infection, was completed. RESULTS: A total of 321 patients underwent ACDF and met inclusion-exclusion criteria, with mean follow-up duration of 20 months. Forty-six (14.3%) patients received standalone constructs, while 275 (85.7%) received plated constructs. Fourteen (4.4%) total revisions were necessary, 4 in the standalone group and 10 in the plated group, yielding revision rates of 8.7% and 3.6%, respectively (P = .125). Mean EBL was 98 mL in the standalone group and 63 mL in the plated group (P = .001). Mean procedure duration was 147 minutes in the standalone group and 151 minutes in the plated group (P = .800). Mean hospital stay was 3.6 days in the standalone group and 2.5 days in the plated group (P = .270). There was no significant difference in incidence of dysphagia (P = .700) or hoarseness (P = .700). CONCLUSIONS: Standalone ACDF demonstrates higher, but not statistically significant, revision rates than plate-and-screw constructs, without the hypothesized decreased incidence of dysphagia or hoarseness and without decreased procedure duration or EBL. Surgeons may consider limiting use of these constructs to cases of adjacent segment disease. Larger studies with longer follow up are necessary to make more definitive conclusions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study will help spine surgeons decide between using standalone or cage-and-plate constructs for ACDF.

Diagnostic, Surgical, and Technical Considerations for Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Osteopenia and Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Osteoporosis is increasing in incidence as the ageing population continues to grow. Decreased bone mineral density poses a challenge for the spine surgeon. In patients requiring lumbar interbody fusion, differences in diagnostics and surgical approaches may be warranted. In this systematic review, the authors examine studies performing lumbar interbody fusion in patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis and suggest avenues for future study. METHODS: A systematic literature review of the PubMed and MEDLINE databases was performed for studies published between 1986 and 2020. Studies evaluating diagnostics, surgical approaches, and other technical considerations were included. RESULTS: A total of 13 articles were ultimately selected for qualitative analysis. This includes studies demonstrating the utility of Hounsfield units in diagnosis, a survey of surgical approaches, as well as exploring the use of vertebral augmentation and cortical bone screw trajectory. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides a summary of preliminary findings with respect to the use of Hounsfield units as a diagnostic tool, the benefit or lack thereof with respect to minimally invasive approaches, and the question of whether or not cement augmentation or cortical bone trajectory confers benefit in osteoporotic patients undergoing lumbar interbody fusion. While the findings of these studies are promising, the current state of the literature is limited in scope and, for this reason, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn from these data. The authors highlight gaps in the literature and the need for further exploration and study of lumbar interbody fusion in the osteoporotic spine.

Normal range of clivoaxial angle in adults using flexion and extension cervical magnetic resonance imaging scans.

OBJECTIVE: An abnormally decreased clivoaxial angle (CXA) is used during the clinical evaluation for corrective skull base surgery. Published normal ranges of CXA using x-ray, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vary dramatically, especially with neck flexion or extension. The aim of this study was to use high-resolution MRI to determine the normal range of CXA in various neck positions using a reproducible measurement technique. METHODS: The CXA was measured in 10 healthy volunteers on sagittal T2 SPACE c-spine MRI in supine and prone positions and with the neck both neck and extended. CXA is strictly defined as the angle between a line along the inferior third of the dorsal clival cortex and a line from the superior/posterior cortex of the dens to the posterior/inferior corner of the C2 body. Statistical analysis was performed in all positions and included mean CXA, range, standard deviation (SD), inter-reader agreement, and group comparisons. RESULTS: The mean CXA overall was 156.92° (SD=4.23°; range 134-179°). The mean value for extension CXA was 169.20° (SD=5.81°), and the mean value for flexion CXA was 144.73° (SD=5.71°), the difference being statistically significant (p<0.0001) regardless of supine or prone position. Concordant correlations of reader measurements showed substantial agreement in the supine position at 0.96, with lower agreement in the prone position at 0.87. CONCLUSIONS: We report normal ranges for CXA in various neck positions based on 3D T2-weighted MRI, using a reproducible measurement method. There was a significant difference in the CXA values between neck extended and neck flexed positions but not between supine and prone positions.

Robot-assisted revision of sacroiliac joint fusion using a triangular titanium implant in an S2-alar-iliac trajectory: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction can lead to significant pain and disability, greatly impairing quality of life. Arthrodesis may take up to 1 year to occur, after which revision can be considered. There is a need for highly accurate and reproducible techniques for revision that allow for purchase through undisturbed bone to prevent prolonged pain and disability. Moreover, a minimally invasive technique for revision would be favorable for recovery, particularly in elderly patients. OBSERVATIONS: An 84-year-old man with a prior history of lumbar fusion presented with severe buttock pain limiting ambulation and sitting because of the failure of arthrodesis after SIJ fusion 1 year earlier. He underwent revision using a triangular titanium implant (TTI) in an S2-alar-iliac (S2-AI) trajectory under robotic guidance, which is a novel technique not yet described in the literature. The patient's pain largely resolved, he was able to ambulate independently, and his quality of life improved tremendously. There were no complications of surgery. LESSONS: Placement of a TTI using an S2-AI trajectory is a safe and effective method for revision that can be considered for elderly patients. Robot-assisted navigation can be used to facilitate an accurate and reproducible approach using a minimally invasive approach.

Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement: Evaluation of Accuracy of the First 100 Screws and Comparison with Cohort of Fluoroscopy-guided Screws.

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS) are used to stabilize the spine after interbody fusion in minimally invasive approaches. Recently, robotic assistance has been developed to improve the accuracy of PPS. We report our initial experience with ExcelsiusGPS and compare its accuracy with our historical cohort of fluoroscopy-guided PPS. METHODS: We reviewed prospectively collected data from our first 100 robot-assisted PPS. We graded accuracy of screws on computed tomography imaging and compared it with a previous cohort of 90 PPS placed using fluoroscopy. We also analyzed the effect of various demographic and perioperative metrics on accuracy. RESULTS: We placed 103 PPS in the first 20 consecutive patients with postoperative computed tomography imaging using ExcelsiusGPS. All screws were placed at L2 to S1. Our robot-assisted cohort had 6 breaches, with only 2 breaches >2 mm, yielding an overall breach rate of 5.8% and a significant breach rate of 1.9%. In comparison, our fluoroscopy-guided cohort had a breach rate of 3.3% and a significant breach rate of 1.1%, which was not significantly different. More breaches occurred in the first half of cases, suggesting a learning curve with robotic assistance. No demographic or perioperative metrics had a significant effect on accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Our breach rates with ExcelsiusGPS were low and consistent with others reported in the literature, as well as with other robotic systems. Our series shows equivalent accuracy of placement of PPS with this robotic platform compared with fluoroscopic guidance and suggests a relatively short learning curve.

Reoperation, Readmission, and Discharge Disposition for Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Pathology Treated With Either Open or Minimally Invasive Techniques: A Single-Center Retrospective Review of 1435 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Spine surgery has been transformed by the growth of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedures. Previous studies agree that MIS has shorter hospitalization and faster recovery time when compared to conventional open surgery. However, the reoperation and readmission rates between the 2 techniques have yet to be well characterized. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rate of subsequent revision between MIS and open techniques for degenerative lumbar pathology. METHODS: A total of 1435 adult patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery between 2013 and 2016 were included in this retrospective analysis. The rates of need for subsequent reoperation, 30- and 90-d readmission, and discharge to rehabilitation were recorded for both MIS and traditional open techniques. Groups were divided into decompression alone and decompression with fusion. RESULTS: The rates of subsequent reoperation following MIS and open surgery were 10.4% and 12.2%, respectively (P = .32), which were maintained when subdivided into decompression and decompression with fusion. MIS and open 30-d readmission rates were 7.9% and 7.2% (P = .67), while 90-d readmission rates were 4.3% and 3.6% (P = .57), respectively. Discharge to rehabilitation was significantly lower for patients under 60 yr of age undergoing MIS (1.64% vs 5.63%, P = .04). CONCLUSION: The use of minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of lumbar spine pathology does not result in increased reoperation or 30- and 90-d readmission rates when compared to open approaches. Patients under the age of 60 yr undergoing MIS procedures were less likely to be discharged to rehab.

Microsurgical Resection of an Intramedullary Ependymoma at the Cervicomedullary Junction: A Two-Dimensional Operative Video.

Ependymomas are the most common adult intramedullary spinal tumors.1 Although uncommon in the brainstem, ependymomas make up a large proportion of tumors of this location.2-8 We present an operative video case report of an intrinsic ependymoma at the cervicomedullary junction. The purpose of this report is to present the clinical picture, operative setup, and surgical technique involved in resection of an intramedullary tumor of this region. For best outcome for intramedullary ependymomas, the goal should be gross total resection.1,9,10 These tumors have a relatively distinct plane between tumor and normal parenchyma, making a gross total resection more probable than cases of infiltrative intramedullary astrocytomas.11 Despite this, significant morbidity can be associated with treatment.1 Proper microsurgical technique with use of operative adjuncts can maximize resection while minimizing neurologic injury to optimize outcomes in patients. We present the case of a 42-year-old man presenting with neck and shoulder pain, upper extremity paresthesias, and gait instability. Magnetic resonance imaging of the neuroaxis revealed a heterogeneously enhancing expansile lesion in the lower medulla and multiple lesions in the thecal sac, representing drop metastases. Due to symptoms and mass effect from the lesion, the patient underwent a suboccipital craniotomy for tumor resection. We highlight operative techniques in our case, including use of neurophysiologic monitoring, intraoperative ultrasound, ultrasonic aspirator, and dissection with microcottonoid pledgets and bimanual technique. Pathology revealed a World Health Organization grade II ependymoma. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging revealed a small amount of residual. He underwent full craniospinal proton beam therapy with boost to the residual and metastases with good outcome. Patient provided consent for this report.

The incidence of symptomatic postoperative epidural hematoma after minimally invasive lumbar decompression: A single institution retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative epidural hematoma (PEDH) after minimally invasive lumbar laminectomy (MILL) can lead to significant morbidity and healthcare cost. The incidence is not well characterized in the literature as compared with traditional open techniques. Our aim was to define the incidence of PEDH after MIS lumbar decompression procedures and evaluate strategies for reduction of PEDH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was queried from January 2013 to September 2018 for all patients that underwent a minimally invasive lumbar laminectomy or laminotomy, with or without discectomy, for which the goal was decompression alone. Charts were reviewed to see the operation type and whether the patient developed a postoperative epidural hematoma. RESULTS: 1004 cases were identified and reviewed. The overall PEDH rate was 1.4 % (14/1004). 78.5 % (11/14) of cases involved at least a single level laminectomy. 21.4 % (3/14) involved a laminotomy alone or with discectomy. 64.3 % (9/14) of patients presented with a neurological deficit. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of PEDH after MIS lumbar decompression procedures is 1.4 %. A majority of patients presented with a neurological deficit.